I don't think they mean nonchalant at all - the dog is closer to nonplussed than to nonchalant. I think they mean nonplussed, they've just never seen the dictionary definition, so they've assigned meaning from previous context. I know what they mean? (And it's not nonchalant).
"Laying", however, bugs the fuck out of me, but judging by the prevalence of occurances in TW fic, semantic shift has already occured, and my cause is lost :(
Given a choice between the two, the non-reacting dog seems pretty nonchalant to me. (If it were entirely my description to write, I'd have said "resigned"; but if we're sticking to the two commonly confused adjectives... while the dog is probably confused as to why it's suddenly under kittenish assault, visually it does not react, so as a non-omniscient narrator I'd choose 'nonchalant'. What was your reasoning for making the reverse call, if I may ask?)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
All I see is "laying" ;__;
Date: 2013-07-24 04:12 am (UTC)"Laying", however, bugs the fuck out of me, but judging by the prevalence of occurances in TW fic, semantic shift has already occured, and my cause is lost :(
Re: All I see is "laying" ;__;
Date: 2013-07-25 01:15 am (UTC)the dog is closer to nonplussed than to nonchalant
Nonplussed: perplexed, confused, taken aback, discomfited.
Nonchalant: imperturbable, disinterested, placid, unflappable.
Given a choice between the two, the non-reacting dog seems pretty nonchalant to me. (If it were entirely my description to write, I'd have said "resigned"; but if we're sticking to the two commonly confused adjectives... while the dog is probably confused as to why it's suddenly under kittenish assault, visually it does not react, so as a non-omniscient narrator I'd choose 'nonchalant'. What was your reasoning for making the reverse call, if I may ask?)