would they really want to adopt the term, and would it backfire on them with people who knew the term's origin. I don't think it would necessarily "backfire", but I don't think it will ever achieve mainstream adoption, no, sorry. =(
re:thinking in bullet points: It's less organized than it seems. It's more that bullet points allow me to have a thought, get it out there, and go on to the next - whether that thought is a child-thought of the previous thought or a sibling-thought of the previous thought - without having to actually create any sort of segue into it.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2012-04-23 09:10 pm (UTC)I don't think it would necessarily "backfire", but I don't think it will ever achieve mainstream adoption, no, sorry. =(
re:thinking in bullet points:
It's less organized than it seems. It's more that bullet points allow me to have a thought, get it out there, and go on to the next - whether that thought is a child-thought of the previous thought or a sibling-thought of the previous thought - without having to actually create any sort of segue into it.
(parens are the best.)