thoughts on anonymity
Oct. 8th, 2011 12:09 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Someone just created a kinkmeme for a small fandom I've long been a fan of, though never written in.
Why, you may ask, is that sentence not followed by an exclamation point?
The creator(s) have made the meme mandatorily anon-only.
This has happened with at least one other kinkmeme for a small(ish) fandom I'm part of, and I found that it somehow puts me off. I've thought about it several times, and I can't exactly pin down why I dislike it, aside from It's probably a combination of laziness and lack of shame. I may have come to better conclusions in the past, but right now I am sleep deprived and under-caffeinated, so I cannot recall them or re-think them out. (Insert cat macro here: "I thunk yu guyz sum meta, but I forgetted it"?)
I'm 100% for people having the right to be anonymous on the internet, and that includes kinkmemes! But being told that I have to be anonymous results in serious levels of Do Not Want.
Am I the only person in the universe who has this reaction to mandatory-anon policies? Is there someone out there who has the ability to prod my grey matter and figure out why this irks me?
Thoughts, anyone?
Why, you may ask, is that sentence not followed by an exclamation point?
The creator(s) have made the meme mandatorily anon-only.
This has happened with at least one other kinkmeme for a small(ish) fandom I'm part of, and I found that it somehow puts me off. I've thought about it several times, and I can't exactly pin down why I dislike it, aside from It's probably a combination of laziness and lack of shame. I may have come to better conclusions in the past, but right now I am sleep deprived and under-caffeinated, so I cannot recall them or re-think them out. (Insert cat macro here: "I thunk yu guyz sum meta, but I forgetted it"?)
I'm 100% for people having the right to be anonymous on the internet, and that includes kinkmemes! But being told that I have to be anonymous results in serious levels of Do Not Want.
Am I the only person in the universe who has this reaction to mandatory-anon policies? Is there someone out there who has the ability to prod my grey matter and figure out why this irks me?
Thoughts, anyone?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-08 07:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-08 07:22 am (UTC)I want that icon!!
I've had that reaction before, and interestingly enough, I think part of it is also laziness - wut, I have to log out before I can comment? Too much clicking, meh.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 04:35 am (UTC)Heh, it really does deserve to be a real macro, doesn't it? It happens to me often enough that I'd get good mileage out of it! :D Feel free to icon-ify if you want to. (Somewhere on the internet there's a picture of a cat in a thinking cap -- or maybe a dunce cap would work better? -- which would make a great base; I'm pretty sure it's a rule! In fact, I declare it so: Internet Rule 4: if it can be placed on/beside/under/stuck to a cat, there's a picture on the Web to prove it. Sort of like a G-rated, feline version of Rule 34.)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-21 03:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-22 02:51 am (UTC)I never had the habit of making icons -- I laboriously made the one I use all the time by scanning something I drew, and... that's it. The beginning and end of my iconmaking. :D (Okay, I drew+scanned two.) I have no photoshop skills at all, and no photoshop-esque program to use them on even if I had them, so my "icon making" never developed.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-22 05:58 am (UTC)If you ever want a photoshop-esque program, I highly recommend the open-source GIMP (Windows .exe).
If you've never worked with layers before, it's a new world, but also with many more possibilities than MS Paint etc. offers.
There's a GIMP comm on DW,
How-to: Simple text shadow in GIMP
How-to: Creating an icon similar to this, *points to icon*, in Gimp
I like to think my tutorial skills are better than my icon-making skills, at least :oD
no subject
Date: 2011-10-08 03:46 pm (UTC)(For that matter, I have been a BNF in some small fandoms, and always had to wonder if praise my fics got was just due to the fact it was mine. A completely anonymous kink meme meant that praise was received on the merit of the fic, not the name attached to it, and that did wonders for my self-confidence.)
On the other hand, a hard-nosed policy on anonymity can be a royal pain, too. One fandom, people were routinely bashed as attention whores if they provided, when asked, links to other things they'd written, or used a sockpuppet account to remain anonymous while getting around the annoyance of posting truly anonymously. In the case of at least one artist, whose style was recognizable enough that people always knew when it was her filling a prompt, someone was so jealous and bitter of her art's popularity that they outed her real name. Which drove her from the fandom.
So I think the best way to handle it, really, is to be anonymous on the meme IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, to avoid cliques and BNFs and favoritism. But when it's not really plausible to be anonymous, or if people want to know where they can read/see more by a particular filler, it's stupid for people to continue to demand anonymity (especially for those who fill prompts) one hundred percent of the time. If someone forgets to log out or wants to link to their ff.net account or whatever, no vilifying, darnit.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-10 04:50 am (UTC)I may also be affected by the fact that the only kinkmemes I have been extensively involved in (except the smallish one where I actually wrote something) have been for very large, relatively new fandoms; so maybe they just overpowered the sort of cliqueishness stuff by sheer numbers? Because I really don't remember running into that sort of spite and fawning, in them... Maybe that leads me to downplay the potential for meme-destroying wank.
best way to handle it, really, to be anonymous on the meme IF AT ALL POSSIBLE
I dunno -- that still falls into Do Not Want territory for me. *shrugs* Although it does at least touch on some of what irked me most about the meme rules, which (as far as I could puzzle out) did explicitly forbid linking to previously written works where the author was identified, but -- upon rereading -- it looks like you are allowed to drop a link to a kinkmeme-written work that was subsequently posted elsewhere for archiving, so that makes me a bit happier...